Italy’s Deputy Prime Minister, Matteo Salvini, has filed a legislative proposal to reintroduce mandatory military or civil service for young people.
The proposal, drafted by Eugenio Zoffili, a close ally and member of the Defence Commission of the Chamber of Deputies, suggests a six-month service period for individuals aged between 18 and 26.
This service can be either military or civil and is to be completed within their home region in Italy.
Salvini announced the proposal on social media, writing: “I am convinced it is a form of civic education that serves the community, instils discipline, and fosters attention to others and self-respect. This can have very positive effects.”
Despite Salvini’s enthusiasm, the proposal has already faced significant opposition.
Defence Minister Guido Crosetto had already dismissed the idea last week, emphasising that “the armed forces should not be considered a place to educate young people. They are meant for training professionals who defend institutions and maintain peace.”
Zoffili’s proposal offers young Italians a choice between military training and civil service.
He said: “We propose the establishment of a universal territorial civil and military service involving all Italian citizens between the ages of 18 and 26 for six months.
“This period will be spent exclusively within the national territory and primarily within the individual’s home province, unless they specifically request to be assigned elsewhere, subject to the availability and approval of the appropriate authorities.”
For those opting for the military route, Zoffili assured that “military training will be provided in preparation for their deployment within the national territory”.
Conversely, those choosing civil service will be trained “to assist in the protection of the country’s cultural, natural, and scenic heritage, with the opportunity to join the national civil protection system, public rescue operations, and collaborate with the National Fire Brigade”.
Opposition parties have criticised the proposal, arguing that young people need a future with opportunities, not arms. The debate continues as the proposal moves forward in the legislative process.
